Evoloution of Polar Bears (Lamarck vs Darwin) Essay

The Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus) is a bear native largely within the Arctic Circle encircling the Arctic Ocean, its surrounding seas and land masses. Although it is closely related to the Brown Bear, it has evolved to occupy a narrower ecological forte, with many body characteristics adapted for cold temperatures, for moving across snow, ice, and open water, and for hunting the seals which make up most of its diet. Though there are many theories surrounding evolution, the two stand outstanding hypotheses applying to the modification from Brown Bear to Polar Bear are Lamarck’s theory of Use and Disuse, and Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection. The intention of this paper is to compare these thesis and determine the most appropriate in†¦show more content†¦In 1977 a drought reduced the number of small seeds available for the birds, forcing them to rely on larger seeds and nuts, which were difficult for birds with smaller beaks to open. The number of birds unable to eat reduced as they died and gave way to harder beaked finches. Within a couple of generations they had evolved larger beaks. In 2003 another drought struck the Galapagos and as there were many large beaked finches, the food source of nuts dwindled, making the ability to eat smaller seeds an asset. The numbers of larger beaked birds dwindled as food became scarce, leaving the smaller birds to survive and reproduce. Darwin’s theory was not well received when first written in On the Origin of Species, though many scientists today use it as a basis for research in evolution. Both theories suggest that a species changes over time to be able to better adapt to an environment. Though Lamarck thought that the entire population of that species would evolve as one, i.e. all offspring changes together with same adaptation. Darwin concluded that only the specimen with the mutation or an altered version of a feature to evolve a species as they would be able to adapt and survive easier than those without it, thus causing the â€Å"unevolved† to die off while the â€Å"evolved† lived. Over many many generations the species keeps evolving until it has perfected the new trait, also becoming a new

The New Fuss About Daily Life Essay Topics

The New Fuss About Daily Life Essay Topics Bear in mind, if you're writing an argument about whether they really existed, you're want to present evidence to strengthen your argument but will also will need to deal with the counterargument. There are a few thumb rules for argumentative essay subjects to prevent clashes, yet earning a point at precisely the same moment. You will discover that a lot of the topics can be adapted to suit almost any type of writing assignment. You should also choose whether your words are addressing a severe subject, or whether you ought to make the speech more humorous. Ok, I Think I Understand Daily Life Essay Topics, Now Tell Me About Daily Life Essay Topics! Making a speech may be traumatic experience if you aren't utilized to speaking before an audience. 1 lesson I have learned in the past five weeks is the best way to define the external and internal barriers to critical thinking. Often you will receive far better grades if you are able to write on something important. Teachers always search for originality and confidence, so go for this to find the best grades. The Hidden Truth About Daily Life Essay Topics Chemistry In Everyday Life Our whole universe is composed of matter that is constantly changing forms and evolving into other types of energy. Therefore, if you know the fundamental properties of chemistry, then you are able to put them to everyday use very easily. Additionally, mathematics is applied daily in the grocery stores. There are dozens and dozens of selections of glass available, and they're all made using different compositions of these substances. The five-step model for problem solving identify the issue, discover the sources for the issue, create options to address the issue, evaluate the best choices to fix the issue, then act, monitor and modify selected options if needed. Thus, at individual level, economics would help because, regardless of what the profession of the person could possibl y be, being a buyer, he's the section of the financial world. When you choose the procedure you need to concentrate on, you then need to earn a list of steps needed to attain the aims of the activity. Otherwise, you can imagine unconventional processes. Daily Life Essay Topics Critical thinking helps me in identify the precise problem which I am facing and then I analyze it from various perspectives to ascertain the essence of the issue. It has become the subject of much philosophical. Being as there are a large selection of people on this planet there are a large range of answers to this question. Use critical thinking and examine the familiar thing at a totally new angle. Our Life Daily team has researched the feasible alternatives and prepared a brief collection of the very best and potentially most amusing. People today face problems daily in their lives and there's need of solving these problems since they come. It's self-explanatory on the best way to fix the issue and when using it, additionally, it can help you understand your problem somewhat better. Since problems are a part of life, the capacity to think critically in solving these problems to get a better future and for superior life perspectives. In spite of the fact people are busy with work and daily routines, it's still dynamically highly recommended that we spare a while to know what the results are outside where we live, because it is going to facilitate to secure our future and help individuals to fortify their life in advance. It may be tough for you to develop an original topic about life because so many men and women have written about it already. There are various replies fo r various people at various times in their lives. For example, they believe that you must not always says the truth in some situation that you cannot help. The modern world is money-driven and thus, demands knowledge in mathematics to aid in many calculations. Therefore, my theory of the significance of life is logical. You may decide on another animal if you want. The truth is physics is also defined in the identical way. Chemistry and physics are an essential part of physical science. Mathematics concepts are extremely significant in the managing of time. Economics is among them. In addition, the fact he dies, proves that his journey is all about exploring death as an alternative to life. Secondly, from political perspective, it's vital to be careful of what is going on in the other elements of the planet. During the length of the middle ages, the world was considered to be evil and full of temptation. To start with, as part of international citizen, it is vital to keep self-updated for what is going on in the whole world. Details of Daily Life Essay Topics Perhaps you still must understand more about the way to compose a history paper. Writing an excellent essay might be a bit of cake if you are feeling inspired. Welcome to continue in touch by means of your paper writer controlling everything. Writing about the reason and effect essay topics connected with the school's popularity or surviving the initial year in college could be fine to grab the interest of your peers.

Christian Concept of the Original Sin Federal Headship Samples

Question: In light of the understanding of the Christian Concept of Sin as outlined in this chapter which of the views on our Connection with Adam (Federal Headship, Natural Headship and Non-Headship) do you resonate most with, and why? Answer: Christian Concept of the Original Sin: Federal Headship The federal headship theory best explains the Christian concept of sin. The theory states that God appointed Adam as the symbol of the human race. When Adam sinned, humanity automatically inherited the sin. In our daily lives, we have authorities. If the president of a country makes a mistake, the whole country is held accountable. The sin of Adam became the original sin. Jesus Christ came to the world to save humanity from this original sin. Old Christian practices of infant baptism aimed at cleansing an infant from the original sin. In Psalms 51:5, David said that he came into the world blameworthy, a sinner from conception. In Romans 3:23-24,Paul said that every single human being has fallen into sin. However, every person was set free from this sin by the grace and redemption of Jesus Christ. In todays Christian living, Christians must accept Christ Jesus into their lives to live by His grace. The original sins main consequence was eternal death, but in John 3:16,Gods love for the world led Him to offer His only son as a sacrifice to the world, and whoever believes in Jesus Christ shall not die, but will reap the fruits of eternal life.

The American Constitution A Historical Background Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper The American Fundamental law: A Historical Background 1781-1788 Thesis Statement: The confirmation of the United States Constitution in 1787 provided the model for a new system of authorities. Outline I. General Background A. Law B. Human Affairs II. Background of the Fundamental law A. Articles of Alliance B. Shay s Rebellion III. Constitutional Convention A. Popular Control B. Limited Power IV. Framers of the Fundamental law A. George Washington B. Benjamin Franklin C. James Madison D. George Mason V. Ratification A. Federalism B. Anti-Federalism VI. Future Outlook A. Bill of Rights B. Additional Amendments The Constitution of the United States comprises the state s cardinal jurisprudence, supplying the model for its administration and the rules under which it must run. When the fundamental law was written, it was intended to digest for ages and be flexible and adaptable for future coevalss. The fundamental law was intended to be the supreme jurisprudence of the land. We will write a custom essay sample on The American Constitution A Historical Background Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The Articles of Confederation, which were ratified in 1781 was the first fundamental law. The Articles of Confederation dealt with three issues: representation, revenue enhancement, and the extent of control over western districts. The first issue, representation, gave each of the 13 provinces one ballot. The 2nd issue, revenue enhancement, gave Congress power to bespeak money from the provinces in the signifier of revenue enhancements. The 3rd and last issue placed accent on western lands: people were allowed to have land all the manner to the Pacific and Virginia. ( West and Northwest # 8211 ; Caughey, p. 119 ) The Articles of Confederation gave power to the provinces and was faulty as an instrument of authorities. The deficiency of integrity caused jobs in international dealingss and the defence of the state. Although the Articles of Confederation gave the provinces a cardinal authorities, Congress did non hold the power it needed to regulate more satisfactory. ( Robinson p. 169 ) . By 1875 it seemed to many loyal citizens that the alliance was a failure. Washington, Hamilton, Jay, Madison and other leaders repeatedly argued that the authorities needed to be strengthened. Some Americans had particular grounds for desiring a stronger authorities. Some wanted the authorities to protect them from Indians, Spaniards, and the British. The groups of merchandisers, bargainers, and ship proprietors suffered from duty wars among provinces and from British Torahs. Work force who loaned money to the authorities during the wars wanted a stronger authorities so they could be repaid. ( America On-line 2 ) . Many people think of the United States as a immature state, and still our fundamental law is amongst the oldest written fundamental laws of any major states in the universe. Soon after the Revolutionary War, the three million people who lived in the United States became discontented with the Articles of Confederation. The authorities seemed excessively weak to command the people at place or to do the New Republic be respected abroad. Congress lacked power to raise money and could merely bespeak money from the provinces. Some provinces were hapless, others paid excessively much revenue enhancements. Congress had no authorization to modulate commercialism. All provinces were suppose to stay by the Articles of Confederation, but some violated them. Some provinces made pacts with the Indians and with others. They ignored foreign pacts made by Congress and regulated the value of money. Chaises Rebellion ( 1786-1787 ) was one event that dramatized the failing of the cardinal authorities. When debitors were in despair, many of them looked to the authorities for aid. In Massachusetts, when statute law refused alleviation, Daniel Shays led armed work forces to intimidate the tribunals from continuing with foreclosures. ( Caughey p. 126 ) The insurgents held out for about six months before being overpowered by the province reserves. Acknowledging that the dissenters might hold had merely cause, the legislative assembly pardoned all but the leaders, but subsequently widening amnesty to Shays himself. ( Caughey p.127 ) . As Shays rebellion was get downing, five provinces sent delegates to Annapolis, Maryland, to seek and develop a compact on interstate commercialism. Acknowledging the job was complex, these delegates called for a convention to give broader consideration to the job. In May 1787, delegates chosen by 12 provinces met in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and started the work of revising the Articles of Confederation. ( Caughey p. 127 ) . The delegates of the Constitutional Convention were work forces like George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, and Benjamin Franklin. The agencies by which the aims could be achieved was lively. ( Grolier Electronic Publishing 2 ) . The assignment that brought these work forces together was to mend the defects of the Articles of Confederation, particularly the insufficiency of the cardinal authorities. How it should be strengthened and by how much, and what would be acceptable to the provinces. Issues like how to elect the president were debated. Others like the relationships of the authorities to the people and those between the provinces. Through the great via media, the little provinces were given equal representation with the big provinces in the Senate, but members of the House of Representatives were elected by the provinces harmonizing to population. The framers provided the ultimate control of the authorities by the people through the electoral procedure . The senators were chosen by province legislative assemblies and the preside National Trust by the Electoral College. State Legislature controlled the choice of senators, presidential voters, and seats in the province legislative assembly. Legislature was won in popular elections, and it was assumed that the population would finally hold an consequence on the choosing of senators and presidents. The framers felt that the popular bulk must be represented in the federal legislative assembly, yet besides felt that non all the power be given to them. Consequently, they approved an agreement by which one house of the legislative assembly represented bulk will and another house service as a cheque on the that house. Issues to be resolved by this brotherhood of the framers were: the common defence of the members, the saving of public peace, protection against external onslaughts, ordinance of commercialism between the provinces and with other states. ( Grolier Electronic Publishing 3 ) . The specific powers of the president were identified in Article II, subdivisions 2 and 3. The president has the power to blackball any measure that Congress may go through. The kernel of the legislative assembly authorization is to ordain Torahs, and to order regulations that regulate society, while the president is responsible for the executing of the Torahs. Presidential power was limited by holding merely a four twelvemonth term. ( Grolier Electronic Publishing 3 ) . Judicial power as such was understood by the framers to intend the power to make up ones mind instances and contentions. The fundamental law framers did non desire the power of authorities to be controlled by one individual, so that they provided for a separation of power and a system of cheques and balances. Alexander Hamilton called for all provinces to direct delegates to Philadelphia to run into in May 1787. George Washington was chosen as the presiding officer. The fundamental law was framed by 55 delegates from 12 of the 13 provinces, as Rhode Island did non name delegates. Another of import framer was Benjamin Franklin, a senior member delegate who was responsible for proposing the Electoral College, the manner in which the president was to be elected. James Madison was one of the most active framers of the fundamental law, a leader who was to be called the Father of the Constitution. He was a Southerner, slave proprietor from Virginia, educated in New Jersey. ( Robinson p. 209 ) . And another framer was George Mason, from Virginia, who was profoundly troubled about the issue of bondage. Mason was the writer of the Virginia Seminal Bill of Rights, which began with the averment that all work forces are of course equal. This called the attending of the delegates to the inclination of bondage to weaken the state s defence against foreign enemies. ( Robinson p. 211 ) . It was the will of the framers to construct a strong and stable authorities. They besides expected the authorities to organize the power of the three subdivisions of authorities, the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches. On September 17, 1787, George Washington, President of the Federal Convention, sent the completed fundamental law to the Congress of the Confederation, pressing prompt confirmation. The confirmation of the fundamental law would be a gamble for everyone. Much would depend on the attitude with which the congresswomans and the delegates to signing conventions approached their undertaking. One singular note to the confirmation procedure was the deficiency of contention aroused by the agreements in the fundamental law impacting bondage. ( Robinson pp. 234-235 ) . Massachusetts was the first province to keep full graduated table arguments on the issues involved. Issues discussed were expansive jury indictment and how it would be required before a test for major offenses. Congress would non hold the power to set up commercial monopolies, and powers non assigned to the authorities were reserved for the provinces. Massachusetts ratified the fundamental law on January 9, 1788 by a narrow border. Other provinces followed. Congress waited for Virginia and New York, and on September 13, 1788, acknowledged that the necessary confirmation s had been given, put the day of the months for the election and the meeting of the Electoral College. New York was to be the place of the new authorities and on March 4, 1789 was set as the official start of the new federal government. ( Caughey p 131 ) . The original 10 amendments of the United States Constitution gave us our Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights give us the freedom of faith, address, imperativeness, assembly, and request. The province besides has the right to keep a reserves ; it is non to one-fourth soldiers upon people. It besides disallows general hunt warrants. ( Caughey p. 135 ) . Other amendments are addressed more straight to protecting each occupant of the United States against arbitrary and unreasonable intervention by his or her authorities. One merely needs to read the Preamble of the Constitution to cognize what the framers set out to give the people of our great state: We the people of the United States, in order to organize a more perfect Union, set up Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense mechanism, promote the general Welfare, and procure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Descendants, do ordain and set up this Fundamental law for the United States of America. Plants Cited 1. United States. Commission on the Bicentennial of the United States Fundamental law. Washington, D.C. ; GPO 1996. 2. Robinson, L. Donald. Slavery in the Structure of American Politics 1765-1920. New York: Jovanovich, Inc. , 1971. 3. Grolier Electronic Publishing Encyclopedia. Cadmium ROM 1995. 4. Caughey, W. John. A History of the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1964. 5. America On-line. Internet Service.